Sunday, August 8, 2010

Fledgling/Polyamory



While at first I was shocked by the overt sexual nature of the book, that's not what overall captured my attention. Fledgling speaks volumes about polyamory. Yes, there are many other important aspects of the book, such as what it says about race and matriarchy, but for me the polyamorous relationships throughout the book caught me off guard.

I guess I should explain polyamory before I go on any future. Polyamory is defined as, "...the practice, desire, or acceptance of having more than one intimate relationship at a time with the knowledge and consent of everyone involved." According to Wikipedia, there are several factors that occur in a polyamorous relationship. These factors are: fidelity, loyalty, trust, honesty, dignity, respect, mutual support, communication, negotiation, and non-possessiveness. Although one factor is non-possessiveness, Wikipedia goes on to say,

"Polyamorists believe that restrictions on other deep relationships are not for the best, as they tend to replace trust with a framework of ownership and control. They tend to see their partner's partners in terms of the gain to their partner's life rather than the threat to their own. Poly relationships do vary and some can be possessive or provide for the primary partner's veto or approval, whilst others are asymmetrical—possessive one way, but not the other."

With that being said, the relationship between Shori and her symbionts can be see sharing all of these factors.

A while ago I was watching MTV: True Life. The episode was about people who are involved in polyamorous relationships. At first, I was very intrigued. I had never heard of such a thing. I watched the entire episode trying to understand how a relationship of three or more people could work. I kept trying to relate it back to myself. There is no way I could do a polyamorous relationship. I would just be way too jealous. However, Fledgling's take on the issue has changed the way I view polyamorous relationships.

The love/sexuality between Shori, Joel, Wright, Theodora, Cecila, and Brooke is very prominent, and although at times Wright is jealous, overall the combination of symbionts and Shori works out. However, I felt though at times the distinction between love and sex was blurred. Several times in the book, Shori seems to be confused by "love." There's one part where Wright even says something like, "Well, is this how you're showing affection?" While the group dynamic of the relationships works well, love is not communicated verbally but rather thought sexual acts. Thus, it's fair to say that love can be substituted for sex and vice-versa in Fledgling.

The book offers an alternative look on how relationships work. Other than the Silks being racist and bigoted, the community of Ina's is very progressive. The people are portrayed as being happy and giving. Ina's care deeply for their symbionts and are physicality, as well as emotionally, pained if they were to die. The community is also very loving/sexual. It's typical for an Ina to have several symbionts that they are sexually active with, along with other Ina's they can reproduce with. The Ina's, in a sense, create their own world among themselves that behaves civilly for the majority of this time. The Ina's community represents the idea that with an openness to love/sexuality and race, it's possible to live a peaceful, fulfilling life.

While I still don't think I'd be able to do a polyamorous relationship, I do appreciate the message it sends. It's not about just sleeping with everyone. Polyamory is about accepting and loving. I think the messages in Fledgling are messages that everyone at some point in their life needs to hear. Although I know that everyone is not always going to agree, and that conflict is going to inevitably arise, it would be wonderful if we could all live in a world that was a little more open, loving, and peaceful like the Ina's world.

4 comments:

Lydia McDermott said...

I really like your post here. I appreciate that you go out of your way to look at other sources to add to our discussion. Nice work.

Allison said...

Great post. Although polygamous relationships is a theme that runs throughout the book, I never thought that much about the topic. I guess its because our society has it ingrained in our minds that monogamous relationships the only option that is excepted. I have always had a negative outlook on polygamous relationships, but as you have pointed out in your post, Butler brings too the table the more positive characteristics or polygamous relationships. I agree with you, I could never be in a relationship with more than one other person, but I guess some people are able to function in that type of relationship fine.

Andi said...

I am always so impressed with all of the connections you keep making! I agree with you that the Ina's society is progressive and frankly above most other societies because of the love and happiness they all exude in their more than sufficient communities. I don't think I could ever make a polyamorous relationship work, and frankly I don't think I would be able to be a part of one in the first place. I'm now intrigued to see that MTV True Life special.

hada411 said...

I can’t say I totally agree with the dynamic of love and sex that you pointed out. I don’t think that Shori was confused by love at all. To me I saw an obvious distinction between love, sex and feeding as well. When the other girl has sex with another sym there is no jealousy in it. Also, Shori feeds on some people and she has no attachment to them. There are some parts where I can see what you’re talking about. For instance, when Shori bites the man in his house by that was by her mother’s house, she knew she did something wrong when she figured out that somebody else had bitten her. That I feel is kind of funny because the process of feeding is given traits usually held by a sexual relationship.